Port of Portland’s fixation on a flight to South Korea

Port of Portland’s fixation on a flight to South Korea

There has not been a lot of reporting on this that I can find but I think it is worth a discussion. Last year there were whispers of the Port of Portland, who runs Portland International Airport, looking to get service to Seoul-Incheon and Tokyo. Then in March of this year during a presentation for PDX2045, David Zielke, General Manager Air Service Development at Port of Portland, shared a map of desired routes and answered questions about potential Asian destinations. You can read about it starting on page two of this PDF.

Around two months ago the Port gave an update and it sounded like service to Seoul was promising but not firm:

Seems like Seoul is the front runner now, but in the medium term im sure the Port would love to service to both Seoul and Tokyo bsky.app/profile/macc…

[image or embed]

— iain (@maccoinnich.bsky.social) August 14, 2025 at 3:18 PM

For me, this was a red flag. Korean Airlines, the carrier that would run the service, must have some reservations about the demand between Portland and Seoul, including onward connections. The Port of Portland has openly said that demand to Tokyo is stronger than Seoul and that they were looking for service there as well. If I was Korean Airlines that would give me pause. The other thing that may make Korean think twice is the lack of onward connections from PDX. Delta, Korean’s partner, serves a limited number of destinations.

The latest news is that the Governor of Oregon and Port of Portland leadership are headed to South Korea to build up trade and promote Oregon and lastly, meet with Korean Airlines and Delta Air Lines to bring back service to Asia.

Air Service Development: Governor Kotek will meet with Korean Air and Delta Air Lines to advocate for the return of nonstop passenger service between Portland and Asia, a top priority for both the business community and tourism opportunities.

I am confused about the Port’s fixation on Korean and Delta. Maybe concerned is a better word than confused. If you don’t remember, Delta basically tried to leverage their PDX to Tokyo-Narita flight to get more service into Haneda and then ended PDX-Tokyo service altogether. Delta also gave up their daily Portland-Amsterdam flight for a 4x/week KLM flight. Their track record of investing in PDX isn’t great, even with their long history here.

It seems that there is a bit of a nostalgic reminiscing coming from the Port of Portland. A desire to return to the old days when Delta ran a large international hub out of PDX. There is a possibility that they want to leverage Alaska Airlines’ partnership with Korean but that partnership seems week, especially with the two airlines being in separate alliances and recent announcements of other Alaska partnerships ending.

But not everything is bad news, there is an opportunity here. The Port of Portland could pursue the direct Oneworld Alliance partner of Alaska, Japan Airlines. Japan Airlines has smaller planes, Boeing 787-8s, that would be perfect to run service to Tokyo-Narita daily or 5-6x/week. The downside there is the lack of a joint-venture and revenue sharing between Alaska and Japan Airlines. The Port could approach Japan Airlines’ low-cost carrier, Zipair, for 5-6x/week service. Their low cost model would make the service more attractive to Portlanders headed to Japan and to Japanese headed to Portland. Or, the Port could go for something completely different, Starlux Airlines to Taipei. Starlux has a partnership with Alaska and is looking to join Oneworld, is expanding rapidly, and could carry a lot of cargo and onward connections to points in Southeast Asia.

The Port of Portland should really be considering the options that are best for Portlanders. Fixating on Korean Airlines or hoping that Delta is going to bring back a bunch of service feels irresponsible. Maybe I’m overthinking the Port’s actions but it definitely does not appear to be in Portland’s best interest to only focus on two carriers, especially in light of Delta’s recent actions around Portland and flights to Asia.

The lounge fallacy

The lounge fallacy

After a recent trip, I am more convinced than ever that the necessity of airport lounge access, especially domestically, is a fallacy.

I have been an airport lounge user for years; For a time I was flying weekly to New York and would utilize the lounge on my return to get a bit more work done, maybe have a glass of wine with coworkers, and charge my different devices. Then around 2018 I noticed it becoming busier and busier in the lounges I frequented and some of this could be attributed to credit cards giving access to different lounges. The airlines had figured out a formula to get more people to sign up for their credit cards and different bloggers, travel content producers, and others were pushing those cards. New lounges even opened specifically for credit card customers (AMEX Centurion, Chase Sapphire Reserve lounges, and CapitalOne lounges).

A person complaining about the wait times for the AMEX Centurion Lounge
A person complaining about the wait times for the AMEX Centurion Lounge

Then Covid hit and lounge numbers fell along with the overall travel numbers. But that is definitely no longer the case. On my last trip, the United Club at PDX, which is usually fairly quiet, was completely full, not a seat to be found. Delta implemented rules to limit access to their lounges and other airlines have followed suit. They are responding to a problem that they created, giving more people access to the lounge via credit card products.

For me, it has become an airport feature that isn’t really worth it anymore. The lounges are too loud to get work done, there is food but it isn’t always the highest quality, and the overcrowding has made it difficult to find a seat or even get in. The lounges have become less of a place of quiet or somewhere to get work done and more of a bar/socializing area.

A lot of business class tickets come with lounge access and I still find value in that access because some of the lounges have dedicated restaurants, so I can grab a meal and skip it on the plane, and they have shower facilities so on arrival or connection I can take a shower. There is definitely some value in those items, I just struggle with the cost/benefit proposition domestically. In most airports I can get something to eat or drink and find a quiet gate for less than the per visit cost to the lounge and I would bet the same is true for most people.

What do you think, are U.S. domestic lounges still worth the cost?